=
Note: Conversion is based on the latest values and formulas.
What kind of prefix do you use for member variables? The language reserves stuff that begins with underscore for the implementation in some instances (depending on scope). There's also special treatment for double underscore, or underscore following by a capital letter. So I say just avoid that mess and simply choose some other prefix. 'm' is ok IMO. 'm_' is a bit much, but not terrible either.
Trailing underscores for member variables in C++ 6 Sep 2010 · Fwiw, in addition to m_, I prefix s_ to static class members/methods and d_ to the derived implementations when using CRTP. I've never tried denoting locals vs parameters by using l_/p_... and kinda hope I don't as it'd be a lot of work to change. :P –
Why do variable names often start with the letter 'm'? OK, "m" is very much misunderstood. I don't think it matters whether or not you use an IDE, all variables should follow this convention. By using this convention one can quickly look at the code immediately in front of them and readily understand the scope of the variables, I find this extremely important with Android Activities.
Why use prefixes like m_ on data members in C++ classes? The 'm' prefix also avoids the (IMHO) ugly and wordy "this->" notation, and the inconsistency that it guarantees (even if you are careful you'll usually end up with a mixture of 'this->data' and 'data' in the same class, because nothing enforces a consistent spelling of the name).
coding standards - C# - Why are prefixes on fields discouraged ... 15 Jun 2017 · The advantage of m_ over this. is that it's shorter and that you won't accidentally forget about the prefix. The advantage of _ over m_ is that it's shorter and that anything starting with the prefix is sorted at the top is sorted alphabetically by a tool. The advantage of _ over this. is that it's shorter and that you won't accidentally forget ...
What does `m_` variable prefix mean? - Stack Overflow 21 Oct 2012 · To complete the current answers and as the question is not language specific, some C-project use the prefix m_ to define global variables that are specific to a file - and g_ for global variables that have a scoped larger than the file they are defined. In this case global variables defined with prefix m_ should be defined as static.
Naming convention: field starting with "m" or "s" m is typically for a public member (see this answer for common C code conventions Why use prefixes on member variables in C++ classes). I've never seen s before, but based on that answer: m for members ; c for constants/readonlys ; p for pointer (and pp for pointer to pointer) v for volatile ; s for static ; i for indexes and iterators ; e for ...
c++ - Mentality behind GNU _M_ prefixing - Stack Overflow 21 Mar 2014 · But I don't get why the _M_ prefix is preferred for private member functions. If I see some code that called for example: is_shared(); there is essentially only a few options: it's a member function of this class; it's a member function of a parent class; it's a global function. The first two, would both have the prefix so it's no help.
Java variables 'm' and 'p' prefixes - Stack Overflow 10 Nov 2014 · The m and p prefixes aren't part of Java's syntax per-se, they're just a convention used in some projects. m is short for "member" and p is short for "parameter". This way, when reading a long block of code, it's clear where each variable comes from, and what it means.
Why do most fields (class members) in Android tutorial start with … 19 Jan 2010 · A real stupid prefix. Use your IDE to generate setters/getters and you end up with getmName() and setmName()! Also tools like Lombok for generation setters, getters, contructors etc will generate the m prefix. In my optionion the m prefix does not add value and should be removed from the naming convention. –