quickconverts.org
☰

The Discipline Of Teams Harvard Business Review

Image related to the-discipline-of-teams-harvard-business-review

The Discipline of Teams: Building High-Performing Units



The Harvard Business Review (HBR) article, "The Discipline of Teams," emphasizes that high-performing teams aren't born; they're built through deliberate effort and a structured approach. While natural talent and individual brilliance contribute, consistent success hinges on establishing clear norms, roles, and processes. This article unpacks the key principles outlined in the HBR piece, providing practical insights and examples for building effective teams.


I. Defining Team Effectiveness: Beyond Shared Goals



The article challenges the common misconception that shared goals alone define a high-performing team. While a common purpose is crucial, it's merely the foundation. True team effectiveness requires meticulous attention to several interdependent elements:

Shared Understanding: Team members need a crystal-clear understanding of their collective goals, individual roles, and how their contributions fit into the larger picture. Ambiguity breeds conflict and inefficiency. For example, a product development team needs to agree not only on the product's features but also on the process for design, testing, and launch.

Structured Processes: Effective teams establish clear processes for decision-making, communication, conflict resolution, and task management. This eliminates guesswork and ensures accountability. Agile methodologies, for instance, provide structured frameworks for software development teams to manage their work effectively.

Strong Norms: Teams thrive on shared expectations for behavior and collaboration. These norms, often unwritten, govern how team members interact, handle disagreements, and approach challenges. A strong norm might be "open and honest communication," ensuring that issues are addressed proactively rather than festering.

Mutual Accountability: Team members must be held accountable not just for their individual contributions but also for the collective performance. This requires mechanisms for monitoring progress, providing feedback, and addressing performance gaps. Regular check-ins and progress reviews are essential for maintaining accountability.


II. The Role of Leadership in Team Discipline



Effective team leadership is not about controlling individuals but about fostering a culture of collaboration and accountability. Leaders play a pivotal role in:

Establishing Clear Goals and Expectations: Leaders need to clearly articulate the team's purpose, objectives, and individual roles, ensuring everyone understands their contributions and how they contribute to the overall success.

Designing Effective Structures and Processes: Leaders are responsible for designing systems that facilitate collaboration and ensure efficient workflows. This may involve choosing appropriate project management tools, defining clear communication channels, and establishing decision-making processes.

Promoting Collaboration and Trust: Leaders need to create an environment where team members feel safe to voice their opinions, share ideas, and challenge each other constructively. Trust is built through open communication, fairness, and respect.

Managing Conflict Constructively: Conflicts are inevitable in any team. Effective leaders provide the tools and framework for resolving disagreements constructively, focusing on issues rather than personalities. Mediation or facilitated discussions can be vital in these situations.


III. Overcoming Common Team Challenges



Building high-performing teams requires addressing common challenges, such as:

Poor Communication: Lack of clear communication leads to misunderstandings, duplicated efforts, and decreased efficiency. Regular communication channels, clear documentation, and active listening are crucial.

Lack of Trust: Without trust, team members may be hesitant to share ideas or collaborate effectively. Building trust requires open communication, vulnerability, and demonstrating dependability.

Conflict Avoidance: Ignoring conflicts doesn't make them disappear; it allows them to fester and escalate. Addressing conflicts directly and constructively, using techniques like mediation or facilitated discussions, is essential.

Unequal Contribution: One or two team members carrying the weight of the project can create resentment and burnout. Clear roles, responsibilities, and accountability mechanisms are necessary to ensure equal distribution of workload.


IV. Measuring Team Effectiveness: Beyond Individual Metrics



Measuring team effectiveness requires going beyond individual performance indicators. Key metrics might include:

Project Completion Rates: Meeting deadlines and delivering projects on time and within budget is a crucial indicator of team success.

Team Satisfaction: High levels of team satisfaction indicate a healthy work environment and strong morale. Regular surveys or feedback sessions can assess satisfaction levels.

Innovation and Creativity: The ability to generate new ideas and solve problems creatively is a key indicator of a high-performing team.

Adaptability and Resilience: The ability to adapt to changing circumstances and recover from setbacks demonstrates team strength and flexibility.


Summary



Building high-performing teams requires a disciplined approach that goes beyond simply assembling talented individuals. It necessitates careful attention to shared understanding, structured processes, strong norms, and mutual accountability. Effective leadership is critical in shaping team culture, managing conflict, and ensuring efficient workflows. By focusing on these key principles, organizations can cultivate teams that consistently deliver exceptional results.


FAQs



1. How long does it take to build a high-performing team? There's no magic timeframe. It depends on factors like team size, complexity of tasks, and leadership effectiveness. Consistent effort over time is key.

2. What happens if team members don't adhere to established norms? Consequences should be clearly defined and fairly enforced. This could range from informal feedback to formal disciplinary action, depending on the severity and frequency of the infraction.

3. Can existing teams be transformed into high-performing units? Yes, through a process of assessment, intervention, and ongoing improvement. This might involve team-building exercises, training, and adjustments to processes and leadership style.

4. How can you measure the success of team-building initiatives? Use metrics like improved team satisfaction, increased project completion rates, reduced conflict, and enhanced innovation.

5. What role does technology play in building high-performing teams? Project management software, communication platforms, and collaboration tools can significantly enhance teamwork and efficiency. Choosing the right tools is crucial for optimized workflow.

Links:

Converter Tool

Conversion Result:

=

Note: Conversion is based on the latest values and formulas.

Formatted Text:

when is 12 am and 12 pm
acetyl coa
ascii break
ella says
where do most redheads live
java set size
6 sentences
patient safety goals 2020
what is a thesaurus
conditions in the trenches ww1
1891
solve for y calculator
co2 specific heat capacity
median duck
have an effect on someone meaning

Search Results:

The Discipline of Teams - Harvard Business Review Guides … The Discipline of Teams. A summary of the full-length HBR article by Jon R. Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith, highlighting key ideas. THE IDEA IN BRIEF. Managing across is especially challenging when you’re leading a group of colleagues. You’re not their boss, but on this project, you’re their leader.

The Discipline of Teams (Harvard Business Review Classics) 8 Jan 2009 · In "The Discipline of Teams," Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams--such as selecting team members for skill, not compatibility--and explain how managers can set …

The Discipline of Teams - Harvard Business Review Leadership Library ... The Discipline of Teams. by Jon R. Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith. EARLY IN THE 1980S, Bill Greenwood and a small band of rebel railroaders took on most of the top management of Burlington Northern and created a multibillion-dollar business in “piggybacking” rail services despite widespread resistance, even resentment, within the company ...

The role of leader’s paradox mindset and team reflexivity in … 19 Mar 2025 · ABSTRACT. This study draws on transformative learning theory to investigate how a leader’s paradox mindset and team reflexivity help build the positive relationship between team diversity and knowledge sharing and examines these hypotheses using path analysis in Mplus with data from 96 teams in China.

The Discipline of Teams - Harvard Business Review Katzenbach and Smith identify three basic types of teams: teams that recommend things–task forces or project groups; teams that make or do things–manufacturing, operations, or marketing groups;...

The discipline of teams - ResearchGate 1 Jul 2005 · How can managers know when the team option makes sense, and what can they do to ensure team success? In this groundbreaking 1993 article, authors Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith answer these...

The Discipline of Teams., Harvard Business Review, 1993 - ERIC Harvard Business Review, v71 n2 p111-20 Mar-Apr 1993. Teams share commitment, translate purpose into performance goals, and have members be accountable with and to their teammates. Types of teams are those that recommend, make or do things, and run things.

The Discipline of Teams - ResearchGate 1 Jul 2005 · The increasing importance of teams in the business world and the burgeoning field of study of group dynamics in the psychological and social sciences are the focal points of this academic paper...

The Discipline of Teams (Harvard Business Review Classics) 1 Jan 2009 · In The Discipline of Teams, Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams such as selecting team members for skill, not compatibility--and explain how managers can set …

Three Areas Where Boards Spend Their Time But Don’t See … 16 Mar 2025 · When asked to rank how much time the board spent engaging in nine different activities over the past 12 months, strategic planning and review and enterprise-wide risk review rose to the top. However, despite the fact that 85% of board directors ranked strategic planning and review as a top two item for time spent, just 56% feel their organization consistently meets …

The Discipline of Teams - Jon R. Katzenbach, Douglas K. Smith In The Discipline of Teams, Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams--such as selecting team members for skill, not...

The Discipline of Teams | Harvard Business Publishing Education 1 Jul 2005 · How can managers know when the team option makes sense and what they can do to ensure team success? In this article, drawn from their recent book The Wisdom of Teams, McKinsey partners Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith answer these questions and outline the discipline that makes a real team.

HBR's 10 Must Reads on Teams (with featured article "The Discipline … 5 Mar 2013 · Most teams underperform. Yours can beat the odds. If you read nothing else on building better teams, read these 10 articles. We’ve combed through hundreds of articles in the Harvard Business...

3 Types of Silos That Stifle Collaboration—and How to Dismantle … 17 Mar 2025 · An American Management Association survey from 2002 found that 83% of executives recognize the presence of silos in their companies, with 97% reporting a negative impact on business. These ...

The Discipline of Teams - O'Reilly Media In The Discipline of Teams, Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams—such as selecting team members for skill, not compatibility—and explain how managers can set specific goals to foster team development.

HBR's 10 Must Reads on Teams (with featured article "The Discipline … If you read nothing else on building better teams, read these 10 articles. We've combed through hundreds of articles in the Harvard Business Review archive and selected the most important ones to help you assemble and steer teams that get results.

The Discipline of Teams (Harvard Business Review Classics) 8 Jan 2009 · In "The Discipline of Teams," Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams--such as selecting team members for skill,...

Wasabi Technologies (B) - Harvard Business Publishing Education 19 Mar 2025 · Set in 2019, the "Wasabi Technologies (A)" case centers on Wasabi Technologies (Wasabi), a successful hot cloud storage company based in Boston, Massachusetts. Founder and CEO David Friend is ready to scale the four-year-old venture rapidly. Wasabi had so far focused on direct sales, but an opportunity to pivot to channel sales was on the horizon. The …

Effective Teams, Exceptional Results: Insights From A ... - Forbes 27 Mar 2025 · In my experience, 70 to 80 percent of leaders I’ve worked with think their teams are high-performing while only 20 to 30 percent of employees describe their teams as high-performing.

The Discipline of Teams - Google Books 8 Jan 2009 · In The Discipline of Teams, Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams—such as selecting team members for skill, not...

Team Learning in the Field: An Organizing Framework and … 20 Feb 2025 · In his influential management book, The Fifth Discipline, Senge (1990) argued that a fixed commitment to a vision, counterintuitively, constitutes a bad strategy for a company. Business environments inevitably change, and organizations must adapt to succeed over time. To this end, building on the seminal work of Argyris (1967, 1976), Senge advocated developing …

The discipline of teams - PubMed How can managers know when the team option makes sense and what they can do to ensure team success? In this article, drawn from their recent book The Wisdom of Teams, McKinsey partners Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith answer these questions and outline the discipline that makes a real team.

The Discipline of Teams (Harvard Business Review Classics) 8 Jan 2009 · In The Discipline of Teams, Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams―such as selecting team members for skill, not compatibility―and explain how managers can …

The Discipline of Teams - Harvard Business Review Katzenbach and Smith identify three basic types of teams: teams that recommend things–task forces or project groups; teams that make or do things–manufacturing, operations, or marketing groups;...

B EST OF HBR 1993 The Discipline of Teams - Cormentis In this groundbreaking 1993 article, the authors say that if managers want to make better decisions about teams, they must be clear about what a team is.

The Discipline of Teams (Harvard Business Review Classics) 8 Jan 2009 · In The Discipline of Teams, Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith explore the often counter-intuitive features that make up high-performing teams--such as selecting team members for skill, not compatibility--and explain how managers can set …