quickconverts.org
☰

London Equation

Image related to london-equation

Decoding the London Equation: A Deep Dive into Turbulence Modeling



The accurate prediction of turbulent fluid flows remains a significant challenge in fluid mechanics. While the Navier-Stokes equations provide a fundamental framework, their direct numerical solution for turbulent flows is computationally prohibitive. This is where turbulence models come into play, simplifying the complexities of turbulence to make simulations manageable. This article focuses on the London equation, a specific type of turbulence model particularly relevant in the context of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and its applications in astrophysics and plasma physics. We will explore its derivation, underlying assumptions, applications, and limitations.


1. The Navier-Stokes Equations and the Need for Simplification



The Navier-Stokes equations describe the motion of viscous fluids. For incompressible flows, they are:

∇ ⋅ u = 0 (Continuity Equation)

∂u/∂t + (u ⋅ ∇)u = −(1/ρ)∇p + ν∇²u + f (Momentum Equation)


where:

u is the velocity vector
p is the pressure
ρ is the density
ν is the kinematic viscosity
f represents external forces


In turbulent flows, the velocity field exhibits chaotic fluctuations across a wide range of scales. Directly solving the Navier-Stokes equations for such flows requires an incredibly fine mesh and immense computational resources, rendering it impractical for many real-world applications. This necessitates the development of turbulence models.


2. Introducing the London Equation: A Simplified MHD Model



The London equation is a specific model used in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), a branch of fluid mechanics dealing with electrically conducting fluids. It's a simplified version of the full MHD equations, focusing on the behaviour of superconductors. Unlike standard turbulence models which focus on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, the London equation directly models the supercurrent, which is the macroscopic effect of microscopic quantum behavior in superconductors.

The equation itself is:

j = -(n_s e²/m) A

Where:

j is the supercurrent density
n_s is the density of superconducting charge carriers
e is the elementary charge
m is the effective mass of the charge carriers
A is the magnetic vector potential


This equation highlights a crucial characteristic of superconductors: the ability to carry a current without any resistance. The current is directly proportional to the magnetic vector potential, signifying the relationship between the electromagnetic field and the supercurrent.


3. Applications of the London Equation



The London equation finds its primary applications in the study of:

Type I superconductors: These materials exhibit a sharp transition to the superconducting state. The London equation accurately describes their response to applied magnetic fields, including the penetration depth of the magnetic field into the superconductor.

Magnetic field expulsion: The London equation explains the Meissner effect – the expulsion of magnetic fields from the interior of a superconductor. This occurs because the supercurrents generate a magnetic field that exactly cancels the applied field inside the material.

Flux quantization in superconducting rings: The London equation, combined with the quantization of magnetic flux, explains the phenomenon of quantized magnetic flux trapped within superconducting rings.


Example: Consider a superconducting wire carrying a current. The London equation helps calculate the distribution of the current within the wire and the resulting magnetic field. This is crucial in designing superconducting magnets for applications like MRI machines.


4. Limitations of the London Equation



The London equation, while valuable, has limitations:

It's a phenomenological model: It doesn't derive from the fundamental microscopic equations governing electron behavior in superconductors.

It doesn't account for all superconductivity phenomena: It fails to describe type II superconductors, which exhibit mixed states of normal and superconducting regions.

It neglects thermal effects: The equation doesn't explicitly incorporate temperature dependence, crucial for understanding the transition temperature.


5. Conclusion



The London equation, despite its limitations, offers a powerful and practical tool for understanding the behavior of type I superconductors in magnetic fields. Its simplicity allows for analytical solutions in many cases, providing valuable insights into fundamental phenomena like the Meissner effect and flux quantization. While more sophisticated models exist for a more complete description of superconductivity, the London equation remains an essential starting point for many studies in this field.


FAQs



1. What is the difference between the London equation and the Ginzburg-Landau equation? The Ginzburg-Landau equation provides a more general and complete description of superconductivity, including type II superconductors and spatial variations in the order parameter. The London equation is a simpler approximation valid for type I superconductors and certain limited conditions.

2. Can the London equation be used for non-superconducting materials? No, the London equation is specific to superconductors and relies on the existence of a persistent, dissipationless current.

3. What is the penetration depth in the context of the London equation? The penetration depth (λ) represents the characteristic distance over which an external magnetic field decays exponentially inside a superconductor. It's a crucial parameter in the London equation.

4. How does the London equation relate to the Meissner effect? The London equation explains the Meissner effect by showing how supercurrents generate a magnetic field that perfectly cancels an applied field inside the superconductor.

5. What are the computational advantages of using the London equation compared to solving the full MHD equations? The London equation significantly simplifies the equations, allowing for analytical solutions in many cases and dramatically reducing the computational cost compared to direct numerical solutions of the full MHD equations.

Links:

Converter Tool

Conversion Result:

=

Note: Conversion is based on the latest values and formulas.

Formatted Text:

155cm in feet and inches convert
how many inches in 76cm convert
how long is 54 cm convert
38 inches to cm convert
doi cm sang inch convert
1312 cm to in convert
convert 86 centimeters to inches convert
161 in inches convert
80 centimeters is how many inches convert
5334cm to inches convert
168 cm in inches in feet convert
how many inches is 101 centimeters convert
covert cms to inches convert
115 cm convert to inches convert
1 cm equals convert

Search Results:

London equations | Example of Calculation - Magnetism 21 Mar 2024 · London’s Second Equation. The second London equation takes this one step further by linking the magnetic field to the current density. It’s critical in elucidating how a superconductor responds to an applied magnetic field, leading to the phenomena of perfect diamagnetism and zero electrical resistance. The Implications of London Equations

Lecture 4: London’s Equations - MIT Second London Equation 5. Classical Model of a Superconductor September 15, 2003. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 6.763 2003 Lecture 4 Drude Model of Conductivity First microscopic explanation of Ohm’s Law (1900) 1. The conduction electrons are modeled as …

Lecture 4: London’s Equations - MIT OpenCourseWare %PDF-1.4 %âãÏÓ 306 0 obj > endobj xref 306 22 0000000016 00000 n 0000001411 00000 n 0000000751 00000 n 0000001552 00000 n 0000001867 00000 n 0000002387 00000 n 0000002423 00000 n 0000002469 00000 n 0000002894 00000 n 0000003140 00000 n 0000003217 00000 n 0000005181 00000 n 0000005728 00000 n 0000006883 00000 n …

Lecture notes: Superconductivity - GitHub Pages from above equation r J s = n se2 m B: (9) This is the second London equation. It yields the ideal diamagnetism, the Meissner e ect, and the ux quantization. 1.1 Flux penetration from London equations The integral form of Amperes’ circuit law relates the magnetic eld along a closed path to the total current following through any surface ...

London equations - Wikipedia The London equations, developed by brothers Fritz and Heinz London in 1935, [1] are constitutive relations for a superconductor relating its superconducting current to electromagnetic fields in and around it. Whereas Ohm's law is the simplest constitutive relation for an ordinary conductor, the London equations are the simplest meaningful description of superconducting phenomena, …

The London Equations - University of California, San Diego %PDF-1.5 %âãÏÓ 238 0 obj > endobj 243 0 obj >/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[36F00F0C9B201D44A07F927731E75FD6>01E33A30A1824255BD1A9C2051E28342>]/Index[238 12]/Info 237 0 R ...

Lecture 10: Supercurrent Equation - MIT OpenCourseWare First London Equation? First London revisited full long as or Massachusetts Institute of Technology 6.763 2005 Lecture 10 With a number of vector identities, this can be shown to be equivalent to Lorentz force Hence, the above is the full first London Equation. However, for MQS problems we never used the first London Equation!!

London equations - chemeurope.com The second London equation relates the supercurrent to the magnetic field: . Writing the magnetic field in terms of the vector potential , we find that the current is simply, , where φ is an arbitrary phase. Substituting this equation into the fourth of Maxwell's equations, , and making use of Maxwell's third equation, , we have , where

London equations in superconductors: derivation and discussion Equation (2) is known as London’s first equation. Derivation of London second equation: Take curl (that is cross or vector product of del operator with a vector) of London’s first equation, we get. del operator x dJ s /dt = [(n s e 2)del operator x E]/m (3) By differential form of Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction (or Maxwell’s ...

London equations in superconductivity - Your Physicist 17 May 2023 · The London equations are a set of two partial differential equations that relate the current density and the magnetic field within a superconductor. The first equation relates the current density to the magnetic field, while the second equation describes how the magnetic field changes over time in response to the current density. ...