quickconverts.org
☰

Electron Repulsion

Image related to electron-repulsion

Taming the Wild: Understanding and Solving Problems Related to Electron Repulsion



Electron repulsion, the force of mutual electrostatic repulsion between electrons within an atom or molecule, is a fundamental concept in chemistry and physics. Ignoring it leads to inaccurate predictions of molecular geometry, reactivity, and spectroscopic properties. Understanding electron repulsion is crucial for predicting the behavior of atoms and molecules, from the simple stability of noble gases to the complex interactions in biochemical systems. This article will delve into the nuances of electron repulsion, exploring common challenges and offering practical solutions.

1. Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) Theory: The Foundation



The cornerstone of understanding electron repulsion in molecules is the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory. This theory postulates that electron pairs, whether bonding or lone pairs, repel each other and arrange themselves to minimize this repulsion, thereby dictating the molecule's geometry. The basic steps to applying VSEPR are:

1. Determine the Lewis structure: Draw the Lewis structure of the molecule, including all bonding and lone pairs of electrons.

2. Count the electron domains: An electron domain is a region of high electron density, encompassing either a single, double, or triple bond, or a lone pair.

3. Predict the electron domain geometry: Based on the number of electron domains, predict the geometry that minimizes repulsion. For example:

2 domains: Linear (180°)
3 domains: Trigonal planar (120°)
4 domains: Tetrahedral (109.5°)
5 domains: Trigonal bipyramidal (90°, 120°, 180°)
6 domains: Octahedral (90°, 180°)

4. Determine the molecular geometry: Consider only the positions of the atoms, ignoring the lone pairs. The molecular geometry may differ from the electron domain geometry due to the presence of lone pairs. For instance, while methane (CH₄) has a tetrahedral electron domain geometry, its molecular geometry is also tetrahedral. However, ammonia (NH₃) with four electron domains (three bonding pairs and one lone pair) has a tetrahedral electron domain geometry but a trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry.

Example: Let's consider water (H₂O). The Lewis structure shows two bonding pairs and two lone pairs around the oxygen atom. This gives four electron domains, resulting in a tetrahedral electron domain geometry. However, considering only the positions of the hydrogen atoms, the molecular geometry is bent (approximately 104.5°). The lone pairs occupy more space than bonding pairs, compressing the H-O-H bond angle.


2. Beyond VSEPR: Advanced Considerations



While VSEPR provides a good first approximation, it has limitations. It doesn't accurately predict bond angles in molecules with multiple central atoms or those exhibiting significant electron delocalization. More sophisticated methods like density functional theory (DFT) and Hartree-Fock calculations are required for greater accuracy. These methods account for the precise distribution of electron density, leading to more refined predictions of molecular geometry and properties.

3. Dealing with Multiple Central Atoms and Resonance



Molecules with multiple central atoms or resonance structures pose a greater challenge. In such cases, applying VSEPR to each central atom individually is often necessary. Resonance structures should be considered to determine the average bond order and electron distribution, which influences the overall geometry.

Example: Consider the carbonate ion (CO₃²⁻). It exhibits resonance, meaning that the double bond is delocalized across the three C-O bonds. Applying VSEPR to the central carbon atom (with three electron domains – three double bonds) results in a trigonal planar geometry.


4. The Influence of Electron Repulsion on Reactivity



Electron repulsion significantly influences a molecule's reactivity. Lone pairs, being more spatially extensive than bonding pairs, make atoms more susceptible to nucleophilic attack. Conversely, the presence of multiple electronegative atoms can create regions of high electron density, affecting reaction pathways and rates. Understanding electron distribution is crucial for predicting reaction mechanisms.


Summary



Electron repulsion is a fundamental force governing molecular structure and reactivity. VSEPR theory provides a simplified yet effective framework for understanding the influence of electron pairs on molecular geometry. However, for greater accuracy and for complex molecules, more advanced computational methods are necessary. By carefully considering the number of electron domains, lone pairs, and the effects of resonance, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of how electron repulsion shapes the properties of molecules.


FAQs



1. Can VSEPR theory be applied to all molecules? While VSEPR is a valuable tool for predicting molecular geometry, it becomes less accurate for larger, more complex molecules and those with significant electron delocalization. Advanced computational methods are often required for these cases.

2. How do lone pairs affect bond angles? Lone pairs occupy more space than bonding pairs due to their less directional nature. Therefore, the presence of lone pairs compresses bond angles compared to molecules with only bonding pairs.

3. What is the difference between electron domain geometry and molecular geometry? Electron domain geometry considers all electron domains (bonding pairs and lone pairs) around a central atom. Molecular geometry only considers the positions of the atoms.

4. How does electron repulsion relate to bond length? Increased electron repulsion between atoms leads to longer bond lengths, as the atoms try to maximize the distance between them.

5. Can electron repulsion be directly measured? While electron repulsion cannot be directly measured in a simple way, its effects can be observed and quantified through techniques like X-ray diffraction (which reveals bond lengths and angles) and spectroscopic methods (which provide information about electron distribution).

Links:

Converter Tool

Conversion Result:

=

Note: Conversion is based on the latest values and formulas.

Formatted Text:

how many inches are in 50 cm convert
284 cm to inches convert
03cm convert
203 cm in inches convert
33 centimetros convert
how many inches is 85 cm convert
179cm convert
105 centimeters convert
103cm convert
80 centimeters convert
169 cm to in convert
37 centimeters convert
47 in cm convert
19cm in inches convert
500 cm to inches convert

Search Results:

Tauri 为什么仍未取代 Electron？ - 知乎 先考虑下electron绝大部分情况下解决了什么问题。 模拟常见开发场景： 有个需求，需要快速原型，一般来说bs架构就够了，整个网页就行。 那么为毛要用electron？ 我只说我遇到的问题。 …

为什么用 electron 开发的桌面应用那么多？ - 知乎 这个时候在套上Electron的壳，就一个字，真香。 还有一个王炸，Electron是跨平台的，真正做到一套代码，各个平台跑。 虽然Qt也是跨平台，实际开发过的人就知道想跨平台运行是多麻烦 …

如何判断一个基团是供电子还是吸电子基团？ - 知乎 供电子基又叫electron donating group（EDG） 吸电子基又叫electron withdrawing group（EWG） 是一个通过改变电子密度影响化合物反应活性 ...

Electron和Qt，哪一个学习成本更高? - 知乎 1 Mar 2025 · 从新手入门的角度，Qt要学c＋＋和Qt，electron要学html，css，js/ts，vue/react，electron，哪一个学习成…

Tauri 为什么仍未取代 Electron？ - 知乎 主流的软件开发框架还是 Qt 和 Electron，我们只讨论 Electron。Tauri 是 Electron 的开源替代品，使用系…

Vue3+Electron整合方式 22 Feb 2021 · 由于增加了main文件作为Electron的入口，再加上index文件作为Vue的入口，现在一共两个入口，需要修改entry配置。 同时，我们需要在配置中指定打包应用类型，将target设置 …

Electron期刊 - 知乎 10 Jun 2025 · 分享Electron期刊最新科研成果！ 原文链接： 西安理工大学李喜飞教授团队高起点新刊Electron

有哪些强大的桌面应用是基于Electron开发的？ - 知乎 2、Electron 的缺点如下所示： 对于开发者：浏览器适配比较繁琐。 有些应用还须指定浏览器版本。 打包体积大：一个小应用打包下来可能就需要几十兆，这个问题给用户带来的负担越来越 …

electron和其他跨平台技术相比，有何优劣？ - 知乎 electron和其他跨平台技术相比，有何优劣？ 使用electron制作的跨平台桌面应用程序和其他的诸如JavaSwing、QT等有何优劣呢？

electron中怎么比较优雅的集成sqlite3？ - 知乎 electron中怎么比较优雅的集成sqlite3？ electron中集成sqlite3需要加个服务端进去吗，有什么优点呢，我看好像有两种写法，还有一种就是只封装数据库操作，在主进程与渲染进程通信，想 …