Applied Overhead vs. Actual Overhead: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding the difference between applied overhead and actual overhead is crucial for accurate cost accounting and effective business management. These two concepts are essential for determining the true cost of producing goods or services, influencing pricing strategies, and assessing the overall profitability of a company. While seemingly straightforward, the nuances between them can be complex, especially when dealing with significant variations. This article will address these complexities through a question-and-answer format.
I. What are Applied and Actual Overhead Costs?
Q: What is applied overhead?
A: Applied overhead refers to the estimated overhead costs assigned to a product, project, or department before the actual costs are known. It’s a predetermined amount calculated using a predetermined overhead rate (POHR). This rate is calculated by dividing the estimated total overhead costs for a period (e.g., a year) by an allocation base (e.g., direct labor hours, machine hours, or direct materials cost). Applying overhead allows for timely cost estimations and pricing decisions, even before the accounting period ends.
Q: What is actual overhead?
A: Actual overhead represents the actual, incurred overhead costs during a specific period. This includes all indirect costs such as rent, utilities, factory supervisor salaries, depreciation on equipment, and maintenance expenses. Actual overhead is determined only after the accounting period is closed and all expenses are recorded.
II. How is the Predetermined Overhead Rate (POHR) Calculated?
Q: How is the POHR calculated, and why is it important?
A: The POHR is calculated using the following formula:
`POHR = Estimated Total Overhead Costs / Estimated Allocation Base`
For example, if a company estimates its total overhead costs for the year to be $500,000 and estimates its direct labor hours to be 100,000, the POHR would be $5 per direct labor hour ($500,000 / 100,000 hours).
The POHR is crucial because it provides a consistent method for applying overhead costs to products throughout the year. Using a POHR eliminates the need to wait until the end of the year to determine the cost of each product, enabling more timely decision-making.
III. Applying Overhead Costs: A Practical Example
Q: Can you illustrate how applied overhead is calculated and applied to a product?
A: Let's say a company manufactures chairs. Using the POHR of $5 per direct labor hour calculated above, if it takes 2 direct labor hours to manufacture one chair, the applied overhead cost per chair would be $10 (2 hours x $5/hour). If the company produces 1000 chairs, the total applied overhead would be $10,000. This amount is used for costing and pricing the chairs before knowing the actual overhead incurred during production.
IV. Reconciling Applied and Actual Overhead
Q: What happens if applied overhead differs from actual overhead?
A: Differences between applied and actual overhead are inevitable. This difference is known as the overhead variance. It can be either underapplied (actual overhead exceeds applied overhead) or overapplied (applied overhead exceeds actual overhead).
Underapplied overhead: This indicates that the company underestimated its overhead costs. The underapplied amount is added to the cost of goods sold.
Overapplied overhead: This suggests the company overestimated its overhead costs. The overapplied amount is subtracted from the cost of goods sold.
For example, if the actual overhead for the year was $550,000, there would be an underapplied overhead of $50,000 ($550,000 - $500,000). This $50,000 would be added to the cost of goods sold, increasing the cost of each chair retrospectively.
V. The Importance of Accurate Overhead Allocation
Q: Why is accurate overhead allocation so important?
A: Accurate overhead allocation is crucial for several reasons:
Pricing Decisions: Accurate cost information, including overhead, is essential for setting competitive and profitable prices.
Performance Evaluation: Comparing applied and actual overhead helps assess the efficiency of overhead management and identify areas for improvement.
Inventory Valuation: Accurate overhead allocation is critical for determining the value of inventory, impacting financial statements.
Profitability Analysis: Understanding the true cost of production, including overhead, allows for a more precise analysis of product profitability.
VI. Takeaway:
The difference between applied and actual overhead lies in the timing and method of cost allocation. Applied overhead uses a predetermined rate for timely cost estimation, while actual overhead reflects the actual costs incurred. Reconciling these two reveals overhead variances, providing valuable insights into cost control and efficiency. Understanding this difference is paramount for accurate cost accounting, effective pricing strategies, and sound business decision-making.
FAQs:
1. What are some common reasons for significant overhead variances? Significant variances might stem from inaccurate estimations of overhead costs or the allocation base, unexpected increases in utility costs, or changes in production volume.
2. How does the choice of allocation base affect overhead application? Different allocation bases (direct labor hours, machine hours, etc.) will lead to different overhead allocations and potential variances. The choice depends on the production process and the nature of the overhead costs.
3. Can a company use multiple predetermined overhead rates? Yes, companies with diverse production processes or departments might use separate POHRs for different areas to improve the accuracy of overhead allocation.
4. What accounting treatments are available for dealing with significant overhead variances? Apart from adjusting the cost of goods sold, companies may choose to prorate the variance among work-in-progress, finished goods, and cost of goods sold.
5. How does activity-based costing (ABC) address the limitations of traditional overhead allocation methods? ABC refines overhead allocation by identifying and assigning costs to specific activities that drive overhead costs, offering more accurate product costing compared to traditional methods that rely on a single allocation base.
Note: Conversion is based on the latest values and formulas.
Formatted Text:
135kg to pounds 300 g to lbs how many minutes is 90 seconds 8 tbsp to cups 103 cm to feet 197 lbs kg 285cm to inches 66 meters to feet 320 mm to inches 14g to oz 4000m to miles 130 in to feet 30 in to ft 35 kilos to pounds 430mm in inches
