Dutton And Aron 1974

Dutton and Aron (1974): The Capilano Bridge Study and the Misattribution of Arousal

This article delves into the seminal 1974 study conducted by Donald Dutton and Arthur Aron, famously known as the "Capilano Bridge Study." This research significantly advanced our understanding of emotional arousal and its impact on attraction, specifically focusing on the concept of misattribution of arousal. We will explore the methodology, findings, criticisms, and lasting impact of this influential experiment.

The Study's Methodology: A Bridge to Understanding Attraction

Dutton and Aron cleverly designed their experiment to test the hypothesis that heightened physiological arousal, regardless of its source, could be misattributed to attraction towards a nearby person. They chose two distinctly different bridges in British Columbia, Canada:

Capilano Suspension Bridge: A swaying, narrow suspension bridge high above a rushing river, inducing significant fear and physiological arousal in participants.
Control Bridge: A low, sturdy wooden bridge, causing minimal arousal.

Male participants were approached by an attractive female researcher either immediately after crossing one of the bridges or several minutes later (to allow arousal levels to subside). The researcher administered a thematic apperception test (TAT), a projective test designed to uncover underlying motivations, and provided her phone number for participants who wished to learn more about the study.

The Findings: Arousal and Attraction Intertwined

The results were striking. A significantly higher percentage of participants who crossed the Capilano Suspension Bridge (the high-arousal bridge) contacted the female researcher to arrange a follow-up. Dutton and Aron interpreted this as evidence of misattribution of arousal: the participants, experiencing heightened physiological arousal from fear and the bridge's instability, misattributed this arousal as attraction towards the researcher. Those who crossed the low, stable bridge, experiencing minimal arousal, exhibited a far lower contact rate.

The TAT responses also provided further evidence. The participants who crossed the suspension bridge produced stories with more romantic and sexually suggestive themes than those who crossed the control bridge. This further supported the hypothesis that the heightened arousal influenced their interpretation of their emotions and subsequent behavior.

Criticisms and Refinements: Questioning the Bridge

Despite its significant impact, the Capilano Bridge Study isn't without its criticisms. Some researchers argue that alternative explanations for the findings exist. For instance:

Self-selection bias: Participants who chose to cross the suspension bridge might already possess a higher level of risk-taking behaviour and a greater propensity for approaching attractive strangers.
Confounding variables: The attractive female researcher's presence might have influenced participant behavior independently of the bridge's arousal effect.
Lack of a true control group: The study lacked a male researcher as a comparison, potentially overlooking gender-based interaction effects.

Subsequent research has attempted to address these limitations, using more rigorous methodologies and exploring various forms of arousal (e.g., exercise-induced arousal). While these studies have yielded mixed results, they have helped refine our understanding of the misattribution of arousal phenomenon.

Practical Examples and Real-World Applications: Beyond the Bridge

The misattribution of arousal is not limited to shaky bridges. Think about the "rollercoaster effect," where individuals experience heightened attraction after a shared exciting experience. The arousal induced by the ride may be mistakenly attributed to attraction for their companion. Similarly, activities like watching a scary movie or attending a concert can increase physiological arousal, potentially influencing attraction towards someone present during the event.

Understanding misattribution of arousal can be helpful in various contexts. Marketing campaigns might leverage this phenomenon by creating exciting environments to associate positive feelings with their product. Furthermore, recognizing this phenomenon can promote self-awareness, helping individuals to accurately identify the source of their emotions rather than misinterpreting them.

Conclusion: A Lasting Legacy

The Dutton and Aron (1974) study, despite its limitations, remains a landmark study in social psychology. It elegantly demonstrated the potential for misattribution of arousal to influence attraction and provided a framework for understanding how physiological states can impact cognitive evaluations. While the specific interpretations of the findings have been debated and refined over the years, the study's impact on our understanding of emotion and attraction is undeniable. It highlights the complex interplay between physiological arousal, cognitive appraisal, and behavioural responses, reminding us that our emotional experiences are rarely as straightforward as they may initially seem.

FAQs: Addressing Common Queries

1. Was the study ethical? While meeting the ethical standards of the time, modern ethical guidelines might require more robust informed consent and debriefing procedures.

2. Does this mean all arousal leads to attraction? No, the study demonstrates that misattributed arousal can increase attraction. Arousal from negative experiences, such as extreme anxiety, may not lead to increased attraction.

3. Can this be applied to other emotions besides attraction? Yes, the principle of misattribution of arousal extends to other emotions like anger or happiness.

4. How can I avoid misattributing arousal? Self-reflection and awareness of your current physiological state can help differentiate between genuine attraction and arousal stemming from other sources.

5. Is the "rollercoaster effect" a proven phenomenon? While the Capilano Bridge study supports the concept, further research is needed to definitively establish the "rollercoaster effect" as a consistently replicable phenomenon.

Search Results:

Dutton and Aron, 1974: Bridge Study - Brain Stuff 28 Nov 2018 · Dutton and Aron, 1974: Bridge Study. The original study that demonstrated misattribution of arousal was performed by two psychologists in 1974, Donald Dutton and …

SOME EVIDENCE FOR HEIGHTENED SEXUAL ATTRACTION … Aron (1970), on the other hand, argued that an aggression-sexuality link exists, but it is only a special case of a more general relationship between emotional arousal of all kinds and sexual …

Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions … Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517. …

(PDF) Some Evidence for Heightened Sexual Attraction under Conditions ... 1 Oct 1974 · 85 male passersby were contacted either on a fear-arousing suspension bridge or a non-fear-arousing bridge by an attractive female interviewer who asked them to fill out …

SOME EVIDENCE FOR HEIGHTENED SEXUAL ATTRACTION … 21 Mar 1973 · Aron (1970), on the other hand, argued that an aggression-sexuality link exists, but it is only a special case of a more general relationship between emotional arousal of all kinds …

Misattribution of arousal - Wikipedia Donald Dutton and Arthur Aron's study (1974) [3] to test the causation of misattribution of arousal incorporated an attractive confederate woman to wait at the end of a bridge that was either a …

Lecture 1 Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under ... Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974, Vol. 30, No. 4, 510-SOME EVIDENCE FOR HEIGHTENED SEXUAL ATTRACTION UNDER CONDITIONS OF HIGH ANXIETY 1 …

[PDF] Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions ... D. Dutton, A. Aron; Published in Journal of Personality and… 1 October 1974; Psychology

Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under ... - PubMed J Pers Soc Psychol. 1974 Oct;30 (4):510-7. doi: 10.1037/h0037031.

Dutton and Aron and the Misattribution of Arousal Theory The misattribution of arousal theory points out that sometimes we attribute the causes of what we feel or experience to unrelated factors. This was evidenced in a classic experiment conducted …

Dutton And Aron 1974