Boyer Moore Good Suffix Table

Decoding the Boyer-Moore Good Suffix Table: A Deep Dive into Efficient String Searching

Finding a specific string within a larger text is a fundamental problem in computer science with applications ranging from text editors and search engines to biological sequence alignment. Naive string searching algorithms, while conceptually simple, are notoriously inefficient for large datasets. The Boyer-Moore algorithm, a highly optimized string searching algorithm, significantly improves upon naive approaches by employing clever heuristics, one of which is the "Good Suffix" heuristic, reliant on a pre-computed table. This article delves into the intricacies of constructing and utilizing the Boyer-Moore Good Suffix table, empowering you to understand and implement this powerful technique.

Understanding the Good Suffix Heuristic

The core idea behind the Good Suffix heuristic is to leverage information gained from mismatches during the search. When a mismatch occurs between the pattern and the text, instead of shifting the pattern by just one position (as in naive search), the Boyer-Moore algorithm uses the Good Suffix table to determine a larger shift. This shift is based on the portion of the pattern that matched before the mismatch.

Imagine searching for the pattern "ABABCABAB" within a larger text. If a mismatch occurs at the last character ('B') of the pattern, the algorithm examines the matched suffix ("ABAB"). The Good Suffix table then informs us of the best possible shift based on this suffix. This shift considers two factors:

1. Occurrences of the matched suffix within the pattern: If the matched suffix ("ABAB") appears elsewhere in the pattern, the algorithm shifts the pattern so that this earlier occurrence aligns with the corresponding portion of the text.

2. Occurrences of the matched suffix's proper prefixes: If the matched suffix doesn't appear elsewhere, the algorithm considers its proper prefixes (e.g., "ABA", "AB", "A"). If any of these prefixes are followed by a character different from the character causing the mismatch, the algorithm shifts the pattern so that the mismatched character aligns with the character following the prefix in the pattern.

This intelligent shifting significantly reduces the number of comparisons needed, leading to a substantial performance improvement compared to naive string searching.

Constructing the Good Suffix Table

The Good Suffix table, denoted as `Gs`, is an array indexed by the pattern's characters. `Gs[i]` represents the optimal shift for a given suffix of length `i`. Building this table requires careful consideration of suffix occurrences and their prefixes. The following steps outline the construction:

1. Initialization: Initialize `Gs` with values representing a shift of the entire pattern length. This is a default shift if no better shift is found.

2. Suffix Matching: Iterate through the pattern from right to left. For each suffix of length `i`, check for occurrences of this suffix within the pattern (excluding the last occurrence). If a prior occurrence exists at position `j`, then set `Gs[i]` to `len(pattern) - j`.

3. Prefix Matching: If no prior occurrence of the suffix is found, check the suffix's proper prefixes. For each prefix `p` of length `k`, if the character following `p` in the pattern is different from the character causing the mismatch, set `Gs[i]` to `len(pattern) - k`.

4. Handling Overlaps: The algorithm should carefully handle overlapping occurrences of suffixes and prefixes to determine the largest possible shift.

Example:

Let's consider the pattern "ABABCA". The Good Suffix table construction would proceed as follows:

| Suffix Length (i) | Suffix | Occurrences | Prefix Matching | Gs[i] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 2 | - | 1 |
| 2 | CA | - | - | 5 |
| 3 | BCA | - | - | 5 |
| 4 | ABCA | - | - | 5 |
| 5 | BABCA | - | - | 5 |
| 6 | ABABCA | - | - | 6 |

Note that `Gs[1] = 1` because the suffix "A" appears earlier in the pattern, allowing a shift of 1. For other suffixes, no earlier occurrences or suitable prefix matches are found, resulting in a default shift equal to the pattern length.

Practical Application and Considerations

The Boyer-Moore algorithm, with its Good Suffix table, finds extensive use in numerous practical applications:

Text Editors and Word Processors: Enabling rapid search and replace operations.
Search Engines: Powering efficient keyword searches through vast indexes.
Bioinformatics: Facilitating rapid searching for DNA or protein sequences within larger genomes or databases.
Data Mining and Pattern Recognition: Identifying recurring patterns in large datasets.

However, the computational cost of creating the Good Suffix table should be considered. While the algorithm's search efficiency is greatly enhanced, the table construction adds a small overhead. This overhead becomes insignificant when dealing with many searches on the same pattern.

Conclusion

The Boyer-Moore Good Suffix table is a crucial component of a highly efficient string searching algorithm. By intelligently leveraging information from mismatches, it allows for larger shifts of the pattern, significantly reducing the number of comparisons required. Understanding its construction and application is valuable for anyone working with string manipulation and searching algorithms, enabling the development of faster and more efficient solutions.

FAQs

1. What is the difference between the Good Suffix and Bad Character heuristics in the Boyer-Moore algorithm? The Good Suffix heuristic utilizes the matched suffix to determine a shift, while the Bad Character heuristic focuses on the mismatched character. They work in conjunction to achieve optimal performance.

2. Is the Boyer-Moore algorithm always faster than naive string search? While generally faster, the Boyer-Moore algorithm's performance depends on the pattern and text characteristics. For very short patterns or texts, the overhead of table construction might outweigh the benefits.

3. Can the Good Suffix table be used independently of the Bad Character heuristic? No. The Good Suffix table works in conjunction with the Bad Character heuristic in the Boyer-Moore algorithm. The algorithm typically takes the maximum shift suggested by both heuristics.

4. How does the size of the Good Suffix table scale with the pattern length? The size of the table is directly proportional to the length of the pattern.

5. Are there any optimized implementations of the Boyer-Moore algorithm available? Yes, many optimized implementations exist in various programming languages and libraries. These implementations often incorporate further optimizations beyond the basic Good Suffix and Bad Character heuristics.

Search Results:

Microsoft PowerPoint - Day26-Boyer-Moore_DynamicIntro.pptx • As in the bad suffix table, we want to pre‐compute some information based on the characters in the suffix. 1...m‐1, and whose values are how far we can shift after matching a k‐character …

STRING MATCHING RULES USED BY VARIANTS OF BOYER … Boyer-Moore is most popular algorithm. Hence, maximum variants are proposed from Boyer-Moore (BM) algorithm. This paper addresses the variant of Boyer-Moore algorithm for finding …

Strings, matching, Boyer-Moore - Department of Computer Science Boyer-Moore: Good suffix rule Like with the bad character rule, the number of skips possible using the good suffix rule can be precalculated into a few tables (Guseld 2.2.4 and 2.2.5)

Microsoft PowerPoint - Day25-StringSearch-Horspool.pptx • We create a good suffix table whose indices are k = 1...m‐1, and whose values are how far we can shift after matching a k‐character suffix (from the right).

04_boyer_moore_v2 - Department of Computer Science Case (a) has two subcases according to whether t occurs in its entirety to the left within P (as in step 1), or a prefix of P matches a suffix of t (as in step 2)

An Enhancement of Boyer-Moore Algorithm Using Hash Table First, it constructs tables for the bad character and good suffix rules to identify potential skips during matching. Then, it compares pattern characters from right to left, applying these rules …

Lecture Notes #19 Bad-symbol Shift in Boyer-Moore Algorithm Build a bad-symbol shift table as in the Horspool’s algorithm.

Boyer-Moore algorithm - Emory University The preprocessing for the good suffix heuristics is rather difficult to understand and to implement. Therefore, sometimes versions of the Boyer-Moore algorithm are found in which the good …

Boyer Moore Algorithm Moving from right-to-left, update shifts of all but last character with the number of jumps required to reach the right-most character. d1 = bmBc(t) - k, where k is the number of characters …

Boyer-Moore - Department of Computer Science Good suffix rule Like with the bad character rule, the number of skips possible using the good suffix rule can be precalculated into a few tables (Guseld 2.2.4 and 2.2.5)

Lec9.pptx - csc.villanova.edu Boyer-Moore Algorithm Step 1 Fill in the bad-symbol shift table Step 2 Fill in the good-suffix shift table Step 3 Align the pattern against the beginning of the text Step 4 Repeat until a matching …

Microsoft PowerPoint - KMP - BoyerMorris The function Boyer-Moore-Matcher(T,P, Σ) “looks remarkably like the naive string-matching algorithm.” Indeed, commenting out lines 3-4 and changing lines 12-13 to s <- s + 1, results in …

E.g. Boyer-Moore - introdu If the pattern doesn't contain the good suffix more than once, we move the pattern to align the biggest prefix of the pattern, that is also a suffix of the good suffix.

A fast implementation of the good-suffix array for the Boyer-Moore ... In this article we presented methods for computing the good-suff table that is used for shifting the pattern in the classical Boyer-Moore exact string matching algorithm.

Microsoft PowerPoint - Day26-Horspool-BoyerMoore.pptx Recap: Horspool's Algorithm ideas • It is a simplified version of the Boyer-Moore algorithm • A good bridge to understanding Boyer-Moore • Like Boyer-Moore, Horspool does the …

MA/CSSE 473 Day 26 - Rose–Hulman Institute of Technology 1. Why is the “ – k” in the formula for Boyer-Moore bad-symbol shift? d1 = max{t1(c ) - k, 1} , where t1(c) is the value from the Horspool shift table.

String Matching: Boyer-Moore Algorithm Suppose we have a pattern “abxabyab” of which we have already matched the suffix “ab”, but there is a mismatch with the preceding symbol ’y’, as shown below

Chapter 7: Space and Time Tradeoffs Horspool’s Algorithm A simplified version of Boyer-Moore algorithm: preprocesses pattern to generate a shift table that determines how much to shift the pattern when a mismatch occurs

Day25-Boyer-Moore - Rose–Hulman Institute of Technology We create a good suffix table whose indices are k = ..m‐1, and whose values are how far we can shift after matching a k‐character suffix (from the right).

Microsoft Word - OnlineSupplement.doc Instead of using just one shift table, two tables are used, one representing the potential shifts with the suffix set to zero (d0) and the other representing the potential shifts with the suffix …

Boyer Moore Good Suffix Table

Decoding the Boyer-Moore Good Suffix Table: A Deep Dive into Efficient String Searching

Understanding the Good Suffix Heuristic

Constructing the Good Suffix Table

Practical Application and Considerations

Conclusion

FAQs

Links:

Converter Tool

Conversion Result:

Formatted Text:

Search Results: