quickconverts.org
☰

164 Cm En Pied Convert

Image related to 164-cm-en-pied-convert

164 cm en Pied Convert: A Comprehensive Guide for Students



This article explores the conversion of 164 centimeters (cm) to feet (ft) and inches (in), providing a detailed understanding of the process and its underlying principles. Understanding unit conversions is fundamental in various fields, from basic mathematics and physics to engineering and construction. This guide will equip students with the tools and knowledge necessary to perform such conversions accurately and confidently. We will move beyond simple conversions, exploring the significance of significant figures and providing practical examples to solidify the understanding.

1. Understanding the Metric and Imperial Systems

Before embarking on the conversion, it's crucial to understand the two systems of measurement involved: the metric system and the imperial system.

Metric System: This system, also known as the International System of Units (SI), is based on powers of 10. The fundamental unit of length is the meter (m). Smaller units like centimeters (cm) and millimeters (mm) are derived by dividing the meter by powers of 10 (1 m = 100 cm = 1000 mm).

Imperial System: This system, primarily used in the United States and a few other countries, utilizes units like inches (in), feet (ft), yards (yd), and miles (mi). These units do not have a consistent decimal relationship; for instance, 1 foot equals 12 inches, and 3 feet equal 1 yard.

The conversion between these systems often requires specific conversion factors.

2. The Conversion Factor: Centimeters to Inches and Feet

The key to converting 164 cm to feet and inches lies in the conversion factor. We know that:

1 inch (in) ≈ 2.54 centimeters (cm)

Using this factor, we can convert 164 cm to inches:

164 cm (1 in / 2.54 cm) ≈ 64.57 in

Notice the use of dimensional analysis. By multiplying 164 cm by the conversion factor (1 in / 2.54 cm), the centimeters cancel out, leaving us with the desired unit, inches.

Now, to convert inches to feet, we use another conversion factor:

1 foot (ft) = 12 inches (in)

Therefore, we can convert 64.57 inches to feet:

64.57 in (1 ft / 12 in) ≈ 5.38 ft

This means 164 cm is approximately 5.38 feet.

3. Expressing the Result in Feet and Inches

While 5.38 feet is a correct answer, it’s often more practical to express the result in feet and inches. The decimal part (0.38 ft) represents a fraction of a foot. To find the equivalent in inches:

0.38 ft (12 in / 1 ft) ≈ 4.56 in

Therefore, 164 cm is approximately 5 feet and 4.56 inches. We can round this to 5 feet and 4.6 inches or, for even greater simplicity, 5 feet and 5 inches, depending on the required level of precision.

4. Significant Figures and Precision

The precision of our answer depends on the significant figures in our initial measurement (164 cm). Assuming 164 cm has three significant figures, we should ideally keep three significant figures in our final answer. However, the conversion factor (2.54 cm/in) is exact, so it doesn’t limit the number of significant figures. Therefore, rounding to 5 feet and 5 inches provides an appropriate level of accuracy for most practical purposes.

5. Practical Applications and Examples

Understanding cm to feet/inches conversions is crucial in numerous fields:

Construction and Engineering: Converting measurements from blueprints (often in cm) to feet and inches for on-site work.
Clothing and Apparel: International clothing sizes often use centimeters, while many countries use inches or feet.
Medical Applications: Height and other body measurements are often recorded in both systems.
Everyday Life: Comparing heights of objects or individuals using different measurement systems.


Example: A student needs to build a shelf that is 164 cm wide. They need to convert this measurement to feet and inches to purchase the appropriate lumber. Using the conversion factors, they determine the shelf needs to be approximately 5 feet and 5 inches wide.


6. Summary

Converting 164 cm to feet and inches involves using the conversion factors 1 in ≈ 2.54 cm and 1 ft = 12 in. Through dimensional analysis, we find that 164 cm is approximately 64.57 inches, which equates to approximately 5.38 feet or 5 feet and 4.6 inches. The precision of the final answer should consider the significant figures in the original measurement. This conversion is essential in various practical applications requiring the use of both metric and imperial systems.


7. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Why is the conversion not perfectly exact? A: The conversion is not perfectly exact due to rounding during the calculation. Also, the approximation symbol (≈) is used because the conversion factor itself is a rounded value.

Q2: Can I use online converters? A: Yes, many online converters can perform this conversion quickly. However, understanding the underlying principles is crucial for problem-solving and avoiding potential errors.

Q3: What if I need to convert from feet and inches back to centimeters? A: You would reverse the process. First, convert feet to inches (multiply by 12), then add the inches. Finally, multiply the total inches by 2.54 to get centimeters.

Q4: How do I handle very large or very small measurements? A: The same principles apply. For very large measurements, use scientific notation to manage large numbers; for very small measurements, use appropriate prefixes (e.g., millimeters).

Q5: Are there other units of length I should be aware of? A: Yes, the metric system has many units (millimeters, kilometers, etc.), and the imperial system also includes yards and miles. Understanding the relationships between these units is vital for comprehensive measurement proficiency.

Links:

Converter Tool

Conversion Result:

=

Note: Conversion is based on the latest values and formulas.

Formatted Text:

world s longest confirmed kill
precocious meaning
literary periods of american literature
true21
lionel richie still live
whats a pulsar
20 ounces to liter
rrrr
are orthogonal vectors linearly independent
how tall is the eiffel tower in paris france
athens vs rome
phases of transcription
to the power of 5
tap english word
320 pound to kg

Search Results:

デジカメで、ORF（RAW）形式で撮影してしまった ... 12 Sep 2008 · デジカメで、ORF（RAW）形式で撮影してしまったデータを、PC上でJPEGに変換する方法ってあるんでしょうか？ ご存知の方がいらしたら教えてください。

CDS (codingsequence)とORF (openreadingfram... - Yahoo!知恵袋 8 Feb 2021 · CDS(codingsequence)とORF(openreadingframe)の違いは何でしょうか？ cdsは実際にアミノ酸配列と指定している(と考えて良い)配列。orfは塩基配列から読み取れるコドン …

エクソンとオープンリーディングフレームの違いを ... 30 Jul 2010 · 普通のタンパク質をコードしているmRNAは5'非翻訳領域 －タンパク質コード領域（ORF)－ 3'非翻訳領域からなっています。エクソン＞ORF（オープンリーディングフレーム …

「CDS」「ORF」「シストロン」の違いがいまいち ... 6 May 2011 · 「CDS」「ORF」「シストロン」の違いがいまいち分かりません。説明を読んでも同じようなことが書かれてるように思います。教えてください<(__)> ORFは開始コドンか …

タンパク質コード領域(ORF領域)には開始コドン、終始 ... 2 Nov 2018 · タンパク質コード領域(ORF領域)には開始コドン、終始コドンは入りますか？ 完全長コード領域（CDS)という意味なら開始コドンから終止よりひとつ前のコドンまでです（ …

オリンパス TG-6 でORFファイルを残さないようにする ... 1 Nov 2023 · オリンパスTG-6でORFファイルを残さないようにする設定方法を教えて下さい。 電源onでOKを押し、上下キーで画質選択モードを探し、RAWとかLSF+RAW以外の画質を …

オープンリーディングフレーム（ORF）の定義 ... 26 May 2014 · オープンリーディングフレーム（ORF）の定義 こんにちは。オープンリーディングフレーム（ORF）とはどのような定義なのでしょうか？一つの遺伝子の最初から最後の一 …

[Biologie Moléculaire] qu'est ce qu'une ORF? - Forum FS … 15 Jan 2008 · Il me semble que l'on défini plutôt une ORF comme une séquence génomique qui, dans une phase donnée, va d'un codon start putatif à un codon stop. C'est donc une région …

オリンパスのカメラで撮影するとORFという形式で ... 28 Dec 2021 · オリンパスのカメラで撮影するとORFという形式で保存されるのですが、カメラの設定でJPEGの形式で保存するように出来ますか？ 撮影後にORFからJPEGに変換するの …

ORFをJPEGに変換できるサイトなどカメラで誤ってrawで ... 6 Dec 2023 · ORFをJPEGに変換できるサイトなどカメラで誤ってrawで撮影してしまい、スマホ、パソコンで開けなくて困っています使用カメラはオリンパスStylus1で、400枚程です パソ …